“A code of ethics for those evil figures known as Public Relations professionals? I’d like to see that!”
Well, that would have been my ignorant, cynical view five weeks ago. In actual fact the Public Relations industry has been struggling to compile a universal code of ethics since its birth. In 1906 Ivy Lee made one of the earliest attempts and due to the nature of the industry Public Relations is not all that much closer to consensus. However, with that said, there is a theory which places a broad outline to ethical behaviour and how to identify unethical behaviour.
To define ethics, the reading states that ethics are “personal values or deeply held belief systems that underpin the behaviour and moral choices made by an individual in response to a specific situation” (p. 111). Due to this idea of individual circumstances impacting upon what ethics can be defined as it is important that Public Relations practitioners utilise Immanuel Kant’s three-step process of solving ethical dilemmas which is summarised in the readings as follows:
When in doubt as to whether an act is moral or not, apply the categorical imperative, which is to ask the question: ‘What if everyone did this deed?’
Always treat all people as ends in themselves and never exploit other humans.
Always respect the dignity of human beings.
It is incredibly important that practitioners can identify what is ethical and what is not as the codes available to them are far too broad and generalised to apply to all fields of the industry. The professional associations that do provide codes simply ensure that there is a bottom line of standards to meet. An example of a code of ethics can be found on the Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) website. One of the biggest setbacks to a larger structure of ethics is that professional associations, such as PRIA, are voluntary leading to the fact that behaviours cannot be enforced outside of the membership group.
Senebti,
Kobe.